It’s likely that everyone except the guilty finds cheating in chess (or other competitions) something terrible. The cheater ruins the integrity of the game, the essence of competition, and is to some degree a thief. Cheating is a blight on the chess world (and the sports world in general), and the efforts of Ken Regan and others to reliably detect it are a boon to the game.
But what about those who are wrongly accused, or are put under suspicion? Are they just collateral damage? Have a look at this story by FM Nate Solon, and see what you think.
Thoughts?
The requirement to enter a Zoom call is indeed part of Titled Tuesday, and it's not exactly buried deep in pages of "fine print". See https://www.chess.com/article/view/titled-tuesday
I also believe that being asked to participate in anti-cheating measures is NOT an accusation, or even a "fairly pointed suspicion" as Nate put it - it's just an unfortunate necessity in the age of Stockfish. I'd liken it to having your bag searched at an airport: it's not particularly pleasant, but it doesn't ruin your day unless you let it.