Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Thomas Richter's avatar

Disclaimer beforehand: not disagreement or criticism, but curiosity and context:

"The India 2 team consists of monsters in their mid-teens who will probably all be at or very near 2800 by the next Olympiad."

That's a bold prediction for 2024, two years from now - a bit but not too much dependent on the definition of "very near".

Of all 2800+ players present or relatively recent, only Carlsen and Firouzja managed to get from 2700 to 2800 in about 2 years (2 years and 4 months to be precise). For Carlsen, it may have been a bit faster if rating lists had been monthly at the time, for Firouzja without the pandemic.

4 years seems "standard" or average/median: Caruana (while already close - 2796 - one year earlier), So, Vachier-Lagrave. Giri was relatively fast (3 1/2 years to get close, 2797, and cross 2800 live) but remained "stuck below 2800" ever since. 5 years for Aronian, 6 years for Ding Liren, 6 1/2 years for Nakamura, 7 years for Radjabov to reach 2799.6 live. And the extremes Nepomniachtchi (10 1/2 years to reach 2797 live) and Mamedyarov (11 1/2 years).

Do you consider ALL young Indian players to be "as exceptional" as Carlsen and Firouzja? A case can be made for Gukesh, the others on team India 2 still have to cross 2700. Or do you expect things to go faster nowadays in general, also for non-Indian prodigies (Abdusattorov, Keymer, maybe also Niemann while he is already 19)? Of course, any prodigy may still follow in the footsteps of Wei Yi (rising star that quit rising).

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts